Jagger Benham
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
744
161
48
8
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 48 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 8 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Breach Of Conditions22
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Other18
Landlord Win Rate: 72.22%
- Property Damage16
Landlord Win Rate: 81.25%
- Maintenance Issues13
Landlord Win Rate: 23.08%
- Bad Faith Eviction8
Landlord Win Rate: 50%
- Harassment7
Landlord Win Rate: 28.57%
Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
SHOEMAKER v PARK-SAWYER
Woodstock landlords awarded $3,762.14 for rent arrears and compensation from former tenants.
Drewlo Holdings Inc. v Dickson
London landlord awarded over $2,000 for carpet replacement after former tenants left unit with permanent boot stains.
AMBASSADOR HURON APARTMENTS v Pimperton
Windsor tenant faces eviction for remaining arrears after procedural failure to raise maintenance issues.
Sebastiao Investments v Girard
St. Thomas tenant evicted after her dogs repeatedly lunged at and terrified other residents in the building elevator.
Port Colborne tenants awarded $3,798 rent abatement for persistent mould and unresolved basement leaks.
Tenant's claim of denied property access dismissed as he focused on negotiations instead of retrieval within the legal 72-hour window.
SHOEMAKER v PARK-SAWYER
Woodstock landlords awarded $3,762.14 for rent arrears and compensation from former tenants.
Drewlo Holdings Inc. v Dickson
London landlord awarded over $2,000 for carpet replacement after former tenants left unit with permanent boot stains.
AMBASSADOR HURON APARTMENTS v Pimperton
Windsor tenant faces eviction for remaining arrears after procedural failure to raise maintenance issues.
Sebastiao Investments v Girard
St. Thomas tenant evicted after her dogs repeatedly lunged at and terrified other residents in the building elevator.
Port Colborne tenants awarded $3,798 rent abatement for persistent mould and unresolved basement leaks.
Tenant's claim of denied property access dismissed as he focused on negotiations instead of retrieval within the legal 72-hour window.
SHOEMAKER v PARK-SAWYER
Woodstock landlords awarded $3,762.14 for rent arrears and compensation from former tenants.
Drewlo Holdings Inc. v Dickson
London landlord awarded over $2,000 for carpet replacement after former tenants left unit with permanent boot stains.
AMBASSADOR HURON APARTMENTS v Pimperton
Windsor tenant faces eviction for remaining arrears after procedural failure to raise maintenance issues.
Sebastiao Investments v Girard
St. Thomas tenant evicted after her dogs repeatedly lunged at and terrified other residents in the building elevator.
Port Colborne tenants awarded $3,798 rent abatement for persistent mould and unresolved basement leaks.
Tenant's claim of denied property access dismissed as he focused on negotiations instead of retrieval within the legal 72-hour window.
SHOEMAKER v PARK-SAWYER
Woodstock landlords awarded $3,762.14 for rent arrears and compensation from former tenants.
Drewlo Holdings Inc. v Dickson
London landlord awarded over $2,000 for carpet replacement after former tenants left unit with permanent boot stains.
AMBASSADOR HURON APARTMENTS v Pimperton
Windsor tenant faces eviction for remaining arrears after procedural failure to raise maintenance issues.
Sebastiao Investments v Girard
St. Thomas tenant evicted after her dogs repeatedly lunged at and terrified other residents in the building elevator.
Port Colborne tenants awarded $3,798 rent abatement for persistent mould and unresolved basement leaks.
Tenant's claim of denied property access dismissed as he focused on negotiations instead of retrieval within the legal 72-hour window.
Unlock Full Access to Jagger Benham's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Jagger Benham typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
Short-Term Rentals and the LTB: When Airbnb Meets Ontario's Rental Laws
Navigate the complex intersection of short-term rentals, municipal bylaws, and Ontario's Residential Tenancies Act. Learn when the LTB has jurisdiction, how Airbnb affects tenancy rights, and what landlords and tenants need to know about this evolving legal landscape.
Substantial Interference and Nuisance: When Tenant Behavior Crosses the Line
Explore what constitutes substantial interference under Ontario's RTA through real LTB cases, examining noise complaints, property damage, overcrowding, and other disruptive behaviors that can lead to eviction.
The N11 Agreement Trap: When 'Mutual' Terminations Aren't Really Mutual in Ontario
Exploring how N11 agreements are often signed under duress or misunderstanding, leading to disputes about whether terminations were truly voluntary and the legal standards for challenging these agreements.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform